California Climate & Agriculture Network

Advancing policy solutions at the nexus of climate change and sustainable agriculture

  • Home
  • About CalCAN
    • CalCAN’s Role
    • Contact
    • Our Team
    • Donate
  • Our Work
    • Farmer Stories
    • Fact Sheets
    • Ready…Or Not?
    • Recommendations to Governor
    • Videos
      • CalCAN Workshop Videos
      • CalCAN Summit 2011
      • CalCAN Summit 2009
  • AB 32
    • Cap-and-Trade Investment Plan
    • California Air Resources Board
    • Carbon Market
  • Farmland Protection
    • Triple Harvest
    • CA Farmland Protection Act (AB 823)
  • Renewable Energy
  • CalCAN in the News
    • Media Coverage
    • Blog
    • CalCAN Newsletter Archive

USDA Report On Climate Change and Agriculture Promotes Sustainable Agriculture Practices

February 18, 2013 by Hui Qian Leave a Comment

On Feb. 4th, the U.S. Department of Agriculture released a report titled “Climate Change and Agriculture in the United States: Effects and Adaptation,” concluding that a changing climate would pose unprecedented challenges to U.S. agriculture that require immediate adaptive actions and further scientific research. The report opens with this strong statement: “The vulnerability of agriculture to climate change is strongly dependent on the responses taken by humans to moderate the effects of climate change.”

Combining professional input and scientific research from the government, universities, non-governmental organizations, industry, and private sectors, this peer-reviewed study provides an extensive overview of the climate change effects on U.S. agricultural production, suggesting that while farmers and ranchers have a long history of successful adaptation to climate variability, the accelerating pace and intensity of projected climate change effects over the next century requires major adjustments—simply put, we need to take action to moderate those effects in the United States, and worldwide.

“Climate change poses unprecedented challenges to U.S. agriculture because of the sensitivity of agriculture productivity and costs to changing climate conditions,” the report says. Through direct (e.g., rising temperature) and indirect (e.g., increased pest pressure) effects, climatic change affect crop and livestock productivity, as well as soil and water quality—resources of key importance to agricultural production. For regions of the country that are already climate stressed (like the drought-stricken Midwest in 2012), their agricultural systems will likely need more adaptive changes to remain productive and profitable in the face of climate change.

What is especially noteworthy about this report is that it goes beyond simply providing a generic framework to look at the impact of climate change on agriculture. Importantly, it emphasizes the merits of sustainable agriculture practices and their strategic roles in mitigating and adapting to climate change. By “developing drought pest, and heat stress resistance in crops and animals, diversifying crop rotations, integrating livestock with crop production systems, improving soil quality, minimizing off-farm flow of nutrients and pesticides,” sustainable agriculture practices help farmers cope with extreme weather events and increase the overall resilience of agricultural systems under a changing climate. “Enhancing the resilience of agriculture to climate change through adaptation strategies that promote the development of sustainable agriculture is a common multiple benefit recommendation for agricultural adaptation planning,” the report concludes.

Finally, the report calls for a coherent climate policy framework that highlights the synergy between mitigation and adaptation. We couldn’t agree more. As a member of a climate change consortium recently convened by the California Department of Food and Agriculture to make recommendations on strategies for climate change adaptation, we bring a sustainable agriculture perspective to the discussion, seeking state-level policy tools to support California producers in responding to climate-related challenges.

Filed Under: Climate & Ag Research, Farmer Resources, Farmland Protection, Federal Policy, General Information, Impacts of Climate Change Tagged With: agricultural economy, CalCAN's work, California agriculture, carbon sequestration, climate change, climate legislation, drought, economic impacts, effects of climate change, farmland preservation, greenhouse gas, livestock agriculture, organic agriculture, policy, sustainable agriculture, USDA

NOAA Announces 2012 As the Warmest Year on Record for Contiguous U.S.

January 10, 2013 by Hui Qian Leave a Comment

Although not the end of the world, the year 2012 remains unusual for its extreme weather events and natural disasters. According to the scientists at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the average temperature for the contiguous United States in 2012 was 55.3 degrees, 3.2 degrees higher than the 20th century average and one degree above the previous record from 1998. Even worse, other than being the record warmest year, 2012 is also one of the most extreme years for the nation based on the U.S. Climate Extremes Index, second only to 1998 in terms of extreme temperature and precipitation, and landfalling tropical cyclones.

In addition to record heat, a historic drought and several storms also happened last year, causing significant losses to agriculture and related industries. Economic damage inflicted by Hurricane Sandy alone is estimated to reach $50 billion, according to The New York Times.

Rising temperatures and related devastating climate events are not freak events but maybe just the beginning of a long term trend of climate deterioration. Researchers of the National Climatic Data Center at the NOAA said the higher temperatures are consistent with their observation and people are going to see more extreme weather with increasing frequency.

Later this year, the state of California will release its climate readiness report that lays out what actions our communities and industries will need to take to prepare for a changing climate.  CalCAN will continue to advocate for resources for agriculture to better prepare for more extreme weather events which will challenge one of our most basic needs – food production.

Filed Under: California Policy, Climate & Ag Research, Federal Policy, General Information, Impacts of Climate Change Tagged With: agricultural economy, agriculture, CalCAN's work, California agriculture, CARB, climate change, climate legislation, climate models, drought, economic impacts, effects of climate change, greenhouse gas, organic agriculture, sustainable agriculture

Megastorms Could Flood Massive Portions of California

January 3, 2013 by Hui Qian Leave a Comment

 

Scientific American recently published an article on “megafloods”, warning that massive floods caused by atmospheric rivers will likely impact California if climate change continues unabated.

According to Michael D. Dettinger (researcher at U.S. Geological Survey) and B.Lynn Ingram (Earth and planetary science professor at Berkeley), atmospheric rivers—narrow bands of water vapor running a mile above the ocean and extending for thousands of kilometers—are responsible for most catastrophic floods that occur in California every 200 years or so. In 1861, a megastorm hit California after two decades of severe droughts and created a huge inland sea in Central Valley, leaving thousands of human lives and one quarter of the state’s economy destroyed.

The regions that are home to most people in California today were put underwater for several months, and boats became the only means of transportation (see photo).

William Brewer, the author of the book Up and Down California in 1860-1864 wrote, “The entire valley was a lake…. Nearly every house and farm over this immense region is gone.” Three months after the initial flooding, he visited Sacramento and described, “Most of the city is still under water, and has been there for three months…I don’t think the city will ever rise from the shock, I don’t see how it can.”

It is estimated that a comparable event in today’s California would force more than a million people to evacuate and cause $400 billion in lost property and agriculture. Los Angeles County, Orange County, San Diego and the San Francisco Bay Area would be especially susceptible to the negative impacts.

The stakes are high, and though action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions is needed on a global scale, California is doing its part to avert these kinds of crises. The state’s cap-and-trade program will be fully implemented in 2013 and is responsible for meeting almost 20 percent of the GHG reduction target the state has set: returning to 1990 levels by the year 2020. At CalCAN, we will continue our efforts to assure that sustainable agriculture is part of the solution, advocating for resources for sustainable farming practices that help lower agriculture’s GHG emissions, help growers adapt to the coming changes, and protect farmland that can help buffer against flood risk.

Filed Under: California Policy, Climate & Ag Research, Impacts of Climate Change Tagged With: CalCAN's work, California agriculture, cap-and-trade, carbon sequestration, climate change, climate legislation, effects of climate change, greenhouse gas, sustainable agriculture, technical assistance

Australia’s model “Carbon Farming Initiative”

August 15, 2012 by Renata Brillinger Leave a Comment

We can learn a thing of two in California from Australia’s proactive approach to supporting agriculture in preparing for climate change and reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

First, some background: Australia has chosen to use a carbon tax to put a price on carbon, rather than the cap-and-trade route taken by California and the complete absence of action taken by Congress.

The carbon tax is the centerpiece of Australia’s clean energy plan championed by Prime Minister Julia Gillard, and it took effect on July 1st of this year. Emitters of GHGs pay an initial cost of $23 per ton of carbon released into the atmosphere. The price will increase gradually until 2015, when a market-based trading scheme will be phased in. According to the program website, “More than half of the money raised will be used to assist households. The majority of households will receive tax cuts, increased assistance payments or both. With the rest of the money, the Government will be supporting jobs in the most affected industries and investing in our clean energy future.”

Here’s where it gets interesting for agriculture. The Australian government has put in place a “Land Sector Package” is a key element of their clean energy plan. They have committed to spend about $1.7 billion of carbon tax revenue over the next six years on this Package. A Land Sector Carbon and Biodiversity Board was established to provide advice on implementation of the working lands measures.

The Land Sector Package includes a visionary combination of programs that are outlined in a government-produced Carbon Farming Initiative Handbook. From the handbook, here’s a summary of most of the programs and their six-year funding allocations:

•     Biodiversity Fund (nearly $1 billion)
Supports land managers to plant, restore, manage and enhance biodiverse carbon stores, including the establishment of wildlife corridors.

•     Carbon Farming Futures ($429 million)
To help farmers and land managers benefit from carbon farming. Includes:

  • $201 million for technologies and innovative management practices to improve soil carbon, reduce emissions from livestock and crops, and enhance sustainable agriculture practices
  • $99 million for grants for on-farm action to reduce emissions
  • $64 million for farm extension and outreach activities

•     Indigenous Carbon Farming Fund ($22 million)
To help Indigenous Australians benefit from carbon farming.

•     Carbon Farming Skills ($4.2 million)
To establish a new qualification in carbon farming and an accreditation scheme for carbon aggregators under the CFI. This will promote the integrity of the Carbon Farming Initiative and ensure that landholders have access to high quality carbon services.

•     Regional Natural Resource Management Planning for Climate Change Fund ($44 million)
To improve regional planning for climate change (i.e., adaptation).
As the California legislature debates its investment plan for cap-and-trade allowance revenue, the Australian example serves as a beacon of what is possible in the agriculture sector.

Filed Under: AB 32 Implementation, California Policy Tagged With: Australia, California agriculture, climate change, climate legislation, policy, sustainable agriculture

California Small Farm Conference Draws Enthusiastic Growers to Valencia

March 21, 2012 by Ted Quaday Leave a Comment

More than 400 small farm operators in California came together in southern California recently for the 25th annual California Small Farm Conference. The event provided attendees with opportunities to learn the ins and outs of developing successful and sustainable farm businesses.

Bringing the next generation of growers into farming was an area of concern, as were means of protecting farms against invasive pests.  Farmers also got a chance to learn more about evolving energy and carbon markets as the state of California implements its cap-and-trade program.

Dave Runsten (left) and Bob Corshen with the Community Alliance with Family Farmers in Davis, CA confer during tabling activities at the 2012 Small Farm Conference in Valencia.

As a presenter in the “Alternative Energy & Carbon Markets: Promises and Pitfalls” workshop, I briefed farmers on the challenges climate change will bring including the potential for increased flooding in winter and deeper droughts in summer. Erratic and extreme weather events already seem on the way to becoming the norm. Yield reductions, shifting crop patterns and increased and changing pest and disease pressures are also likely to occur. All of these changes leave California’s farmers economically vulnerable.

I also talked about steps farmers can take to adapt to the changing climate. Some ideas include working to increase soil fertility and water-holding capacity, increasing biodiversity, and on-farm water storage, as well as finding ways to minimize the use of fossil-fuel based inputs including motor fuels and synthetic nitrogen fertilizer.

On the policy front, I talked about the idea that the entire state needs to be looking for ways to invest in California’s agricultural future. One of the ways to do that is by directing some of the revenue generated by the new cap-and-trade program toward agricultural research, technical assistance and in support of on-farm practices that produce climate benefits.

Over the next few months, the state legislature will weigh in on areas where cap-and-trade revenue (estimated at between $500 million and $1 billion in 2012) should be invested.  CalCAN continues to advocate that sustainable agricultural solutions be a part of the cap-and-trade investment plan.

Among folks at the Small Farm Conference, interest in ways to help farmers meet the challenges of climate change was strong.  You can help CalCAN continue building statewide backing for this deeper investment in sustainable agriculture by contacting us at info@calclimateag.org.

Filed Under: AB 32 Implementation, Farmer Resources, Featured - Sidebar, Impacts of Climate Change, Uncategorized Tagged With: AB 32, California agriculture, cap-and-trade, climate change, climate legislation, effects of climate change, farmer, sustainable agriculture

Urge Your State Lawmakers to Support Sustainable Agricultural Solutions to Climate Change

February 6, 2012 by Jeanne Merrill Leave a Comment


The California Legislature will soon take up the issue of how the state should allocate the fees generated through the implementation of the state’s climate change law, AB 32.  The legislature and the governor will debate how to expend fees generated from the first auctions held this year of cap and trade allowances (aka permits to emit greenhouse gases).  It is estimated that between $400 million and $1 billion will be generated in 2012. All fees must be used to address climate change and meet the objectives of the AB 32.

As we noted a couple of weeks ago, Gov. Jerry Brown included in his recent budget proposal an outline of how cap and trade generated fees may be expended, including investments in sustainable agricultural activities that help reduce greenhouse gas emissions.  This is an important step forward.

To raise these issues in the legislature, CalCAN and our allies sponsored SB 237, the Agriculture Climate Benefits Act.  Authored by Sen. Lois Wolk (D-Davis), the bill outlined uses of cap and trade fees to support research, technical assistance and financial incentives for agricultural practices and farming systems that reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Unfortunately, the bill did not move out of Senate committee in January and was held in suspense, essentially blocking the bill from moving forward this year.

While we had hoped to keep the bill moving, we did find support in the legislature for our proposal, and we will continue to build upon this, with your help, during what will likely be a contentious budget process to determine the fate of cap and trade fees.

You can help make the case for sustainable agricultural solutions to climate change. Write your state senator and representative and ask them to support cap and trade investments in agriculture.

The message is simple:  “I’m writing to express my support for a portion of cap and trade fees to go towards research, technical assistance and financial incentives for agricultural practices and farming systems that help reduce greenhouse gas emissions and assist California farmers and ranchers in coping with climate change. Sustainable and organic agriculture offer some of the best solutions to sequester carbon and reduce greenhouse gas emissions, while providing environmental and health co-benefits.”

Click here to find your State Senator and Representative’s addresses (search by zip code)

Please let us know you sent a letter. Drop us a line to: info@calclimateag.org.

Find more information on SB 237.

Filed Under: AB 32 Implementation, California Policy, Climate & Ag Research, Uncategorized Tagged With: California agriculture, cap-and-trade, climate change, climate legislation, Governor Jerry Brown, SB 237

Calling All Farmer Policy Wonks!

August 1, 2010 by Renata Brillinger Leave a Comment

One of CalCAN’s goals is to engage California farmers in representing their interests at the climate policy table. We believe that an effective response to climate change must support the solutions that farming and ranching has to offer, and must address the vulnerabilities of the agriculture sector. Policymakers need to hear directly from farmers and their allies to understand the vital role of agriculture. [Read more...]

Filed Under: General Information Tagged With: AB 32, California agriculture, cap-and-trade, climate legislation, farmer, Pew Center on Global Climate Change, policy

USDA Highlights Cover Crop and Climate Change Solutions

Reposted from the National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition (NSAC) June 6th, 2013 Yesterday, speaking at the National Press Club, USDA Secretary Vilsack addressed …
Learn More...

What’s New

  • CalCAN is Hiring
  • New fact sheets on climate adaptation: Farming for Success in the 21st Century
  • Triple Harvest: Farmland conservation for climate protection, smart growth & food security
  • Media Coverage

“Agricultural soils can be efficiently exploited as carbon sinks with a variety of techniques, such as reduced tillage, cover cropping and organic systems with better manure management.”

— California Agriculture.  Realistic payments could encourage farmers to adopt practices that sequester carbon. April-June 2009

Copyright © 2010 California Climate and Agriculture Network. All rights reserved. | Contact Us

Site Hosted by Gaiahost | Site by Deeper Shades Design

Return to top of page

Copyright © 2013 · Delicious Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in