California Climate & Agriculture Network

Advancing policy solutions at the nexus of climate change and sustainable agriculture

  • Home
  • About CalCAN
    • CalCAN’s Role
    • Contact
    • Our Team
    • Donate
  • Our Work
    • Farmer Stories
    • CalCAN Fact Sheets
    • Ready…Or Not?
    • Recommendations to Governor
    • Videos
      • CalCAN Workshop Videos
      • CalCAN Summit 2011
      • CalCAN Summit 2009
  • AB 32
    • Cap-and-Trade Investment Plan
    • California Air Resources Board
    • Carbon Market
  • Farmland Protection
    • Triple Harvest
    • CA Farmland Protection Act (AB 823)
  • Renewable Energy
  • CalCAN in the News
    • Media Coverage
    • Blog
    • CalCAN Newsletter Archive

Climate Change Impacts on Vineyards, Wildlife Habitat & Natural Resources

April 29, 2013 by Renata Brillinger Leave a Comment

A study entitled Climate Change, Wine, and Conservation published recently in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences predicts that by 2050 the climate change impacts on the viability of wine grape production will be substantial and varied by geographic region.

While many such projections focus primarily on the impacts on farming and agricultural economies, this study is unusual and important because it also takes into account the effects that shifting agricultural production will have on ecosystems and natural resources. As the authors conclude, “goals of maintaining sustainable development and allowing ecosystems to adapt naturally can be achieved only if adaptation includes consideration of secondary impacts of agricultural change on ecosystems and biodiversity.”

Predictions for California show an average decrease of about 60 percent in the net area suitable for grape growing as production shifts north and upland. As production regions shift upslope, California grape production is expected increase the impact on natural habitats by 10 percent. Freshwater use — already a scarce resource — is expected to increase as vineyards use more water to cool grapes in a hotter climate.

Though the study is global in scope, the authors acknowledge that significant regional variation will play out depending on soil types, topography, microclimates, the adaptive responses of wildlife to climate change and more.

The report makes mention of agronomic adaptive strategies to climate change such as altered trellising and efficient micro-misters. They also mention “managed retreat” to new varieties in an attempt to reduce water use and upland habitat loss and call for increased investments in new varieties.

Beyond individual actions such as these that growers can take, the authors also recommend larger regional planning efforts to balance production and natural resources/conservation priorities. They give an example from South Africa where wine producers and environmentalists have formed the Biodiversity and Wine Initiative to carry out activities such as joint planning of vineyard expansion to avoid areas of high conservation importance, a marketing campaign with an environmental theme, and resources for producers on management practices to reduce the environmental footprint of vineyards.

This study highlights both the consequences of unchecked climate change and also the need for planning and preparation at both the vineyard and regional level — something needed in all sectors of California agriculture as it prepares for farming in an uncertain climate future.

 

Filed Under: Climate & Ag Research, Featured - Sidebar, Impacts of Climate Change Tagged With: climate adaptation, climate change, climate models, ecosystems, effects of climate change, grape growing, habitat, natural resources, vineyard

USDA Report On Climate Change and Agriculture Promotes Sustainable Agriculture Practices

February 18, 2013 by Hui Qian Leave a Comment

On Feb. 4th, the U.S. Department of Agriculture released a report titled “Climate Change and Agriculture in the United States: Effects and Adaptation,” concluding that a changing climate would pose unprecedented challenges to U.S. agriculture that require immediate adaptive actions and further scientific research. The report opens with this strong statement: “The vulnerability of agriculture to climate change is strongly dependent on the responses taken by humans to moderate the effects of climate change.”

Combining professional input and scientific research from the government, universities, non-governmental organizations, industry, and private sectors, this peer-reviewed study provides an extensive overview of the climate change effects on U.S. agricultural production, suggesting that while farmers and ranchers have a long history of successful adaptation to climate variability, the accelerating pace and intensity of projected climate change effects over the next century requires major adjustments—simply put, we need to take action to moderate those effects in the United States, and worldwide.

“Climate change poses unprecedented challenges to U.S. agriculture because of the sensitivity of agriculture productivity and costs to changing climate conditions,” the report says. Through direct (e.g., rising temperature) and indirect (e.g., increased pest pressure) effects, climatic change affect crop and livestock productivity, as well as soil and water quality—resources of key importance to agricultural production. For regions of the country that are already climate stressed (like the drought-stricken Midwest in 2012), their agricultural systems will likely need more adaptive changes to remain productive and profitable in the face of climate change.

What is especially noteworthy about this report is that it goes beyond simply providing a generic framework to look at the impact of climate change on agriculture. Importantly, it emphasizes the merits of sustainable agriculture practices and their strategic roles in mitigating and adapting to climate change. By “developing drought pest, and heat stress resistance in crops and animals, diversifying crop rotations, integrating livestock with crop production systems, improving soil quality, minimizing off-farm flow of nutrients and pesticides,” sustainable agriculture practices help farmers cope with extreme weather events and increase the overall resilience of agricultural systems under a changing climate. “Enhancing the resilience of agriculture to climate change through adaptation strategies that promote the development of sustainable agriculture is a common multiple benefit recommendation for agricultural adaptation planning,” the report concludes.

Finally, the report calls for a coherent climate policy framework that highlights the synergy between mitigation and adaptation. We couldn’t agree more. As a member of a climate change consortium recently convened by the California Department of Food and Agriculture to make recommendations on strategies for climate change adaptation, we bring a sustainable agriculture perspective to the discussion, seeking state-level policy tools to support California producers in responding to climate-related challenges.

Filed Under: Climate & Ag Research, Farmer Resources, Farmland Protection, Federal Policy, General Information, Impacts of Climate Change Tagged With: agricultural economy, CalCAN's work, California agriculture, carbon sequestration, climate change, climate legislation, drought, economic impacts, effects of climate change, farmland preservation, greenhouse gas, livestock agriculture, organic agriculture, policy, sustainable agriculture, USDA

California Hits Solar Energy Milestone

January 18, 2013 by Hui Qian Leave a Comment

The California Public Utilities Commission announced earlier this month that 1,066 megawatts of solar power was installed through the California Solar Initiative (CSI) by the end of December 2012, putting the program more than halfway toward its goal of installing 1,940 new megawatts of solar power statewide by 2016. San Jose, which has installed 54.6 megawatts on homes and commercial buildings, became the state’s top solar city.

Funded by electric ratepayers in 2007 with a budget of $2.8 billion, CSI offers cash back rebates to those who install solar power systems, both for residential and commercial use. In this way, homeowners, businesses, farms, schools, local governments, and nonprofit organizations can offset the cost of their electric use with the rooftop solar power they generate. Because the response has been positive and demands strong, from $2.50 per watt in 2007 to 20 cents a watt now, the rebates continue to decrease while a self-sufficient solar industry is forming.

To put that impressive accomplishment in perspective, one-thousand megawatts is roughly equivalent to the output of a standard single-unit nuclear power plant or two medium-sized coal-fired power plants, which helps to power 750 to 1000 homes. As a leader in renewable energy production in the nation, California has the most solar capacity than any other state—its hundreds of thousands of solar roofs are helping to reduce dependence on fossil fuels, mitigating air pollution, and creating a better environment for everyone. And the state’s farms and ranches lead the country in the production of renewable energy, generating nearly one-quarter of U.S. on-farm clean power according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Achieving this benchmark is worth celebrating. We also caution that as California continues moving toward its clean energy targets, we must be mindful of doing so without compromising our invaluable farmland resources. Developing large-scale solar farms on agricultural land not only threatens the food production system of one of the world’s most productive regions, but it removes the potential for sequestering carbon in the soils and woody material of plants on farms. Guidelines such as those recommended in a report from the Defenders of Wildlife (Smart from the Start) are needed for these types of land use decisions. We continue to look for ways to accelerate distributed, local, small-scale renewable energy generation that not only provides opportunities for local economies but also avoids impacts on prime agricultural land.

Filed Under: California Policy, Climate & Ag Research, Renewable Energy Tagged With: California agriculture, carbon sequestration, energy efficiency, farmland preservation, greenhouse gas, on-farm renewable energy, sustainable agriculture, technical assistance

NOAA Announces 2012 As the Warmest Year on Record for Contiguous U.S.

January 10, 2013 by Hui Qian Leave a Comment

Although not the end of the world, the year 2012 remains unusual for its extreme weather events and natural disasters. According to the scientists at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the average temperature for the contiguous United States in 2012 was 55.3 degrees, 3.2 degrees higher than the 20th century average and one degree above the previous record from 1998. Even worse, other than being the record warmest year, 2012 is also one of the most extreme years for the nation based on the U.S. Climate Extremes Index, second only to 1998 in terms of extreme temperature and precipitation, and landfalling tropical cyclones.

In addition to record heat, a historic drought and several storms also happened last year, causing significant losses to agriculture and related industries. Economic damage inflicted by Hurricane Sandy alone is estimated to reach $50 billion, according to The New York Times.

Rising temperatures and related devastating climate events are not freak events but maybe just the beginning of a long term trend of climate deterioration. Researchers of the National Climatic Data Center at the NOAA said the higher temperatures are consistent with their observation and people are going to see more extreme weather with increasing frequency.

Later this year, the state of California will release its climate readiness report that lays out what actions our communities and industries will need to take to prepare for a changing climate.  CalCAN will continue to advocate for resources for agriculture to better prepare for more extreme weather events which will challenge one of our most basic needs – food production.

Filed Under: California Policy, Climate & Ag Research, Federal Policy, General Information, Impacts of Climate Change Tagged With: agricultural economy, agriculture, CalCAN's work, California agriculture, CARB, climate change, climate legislation, climate models, drought, economic impacts, effects of climate change, greenhouse gas, organic agriculture, sustainable agriculture

CalCAN Summit 2013 Registration Has Opened!

January 7, 2013 by Hui Qian Leave a Comment
Registration is now open for CalCAN’s “Farming for the Future: California Climate & Agriculture Summit” on Feb. 20th & 21st, 2013 at the UC Davis Conference Center. Space is limited so register today at  http://bit.ly/UFE7DP.

 

Registration fees:
Registration fees include full access to the event, lunch and refreshments
General — $85 (before Jan. 20th); $110 (after Jan. 20th)
Students, farmers and ranchers, RCD/NRCS/Extension staff — $45
Farm field day on Feb. 20th — $40

 

The Summit includes presentations, a poster session, wine & cheese reception and an optional farm tour on Feb. 20th. It brings together farmers and ranchers, agency staff, farm advisors, policymakers and advocates concerned with climate change challenges and opportunities for California agriculture. For a complete list of summit programs and more details about the tour, please see:
http://calclimateag.org/calcan-summit-2013/
Filed Under: Climate & Ag Research, Featured - Sidebar, Uncategorized Tagged With: CalCAN's work, California agriculture, cap-and-trade, carbon sequestration, climate change, effects of climate change, farmer, organic agriculture, sustainable agriculture, technical assistance

Megastorms Could Flood Massive Portions of California

January 3, 2013 by Hui Qian Leave a Comment

 

Scientific American recently published an article on “megafloods”, warning that massive floods caused by atmospheric rivers will likely impact California if climate change continues unabated.

According to Michael D. Dettinger (researcher at U.S. Geological Survey) and B.Lynn Ingram (Earth and planetary science professor at Berkeley), atmospheric rivers—narrow bands of water vapor running a mile above the ocean and extending for thousands of kilometers—are responsible for most catastrophic floods that occur in California every 200 years or so. In 1861, a megastorm hit California after two decades of severe droughts and created a huge inland sea in Central Valley, leaving thousands of human lives and one quarter of the state’s economy destroyed.

The regions that are home to most people in California today were put underwater for several months, and boats became the only means of transportation (see photo).

William Brewer, the author of the book Up and Down California in 1860-1864 wrote, “The entire valley was a lake…. Nearly every house and farm over this immense region is gone.” Three months after the initial flooding, he visited Sacramento and described, “Most of the city is still under water, and has been there for three months…I don’t think the city will ever rise from the shock, I don’t see how it can.”

It is estimated that a comparable event in today’s California would force more than a million people to evacuate and cause $400 billion in lost property and agriculture. Los Angeles County, Orange County, San Diego and the San Francisco Bay Area would be especially susceptible to the negative impacts.

The stakes are high, and though action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions is needed on a global scale, California is doing its part to avert these kinds of crises. The state’s cap-and-trade program will be fully implemented in 2013 and is responsible for meeting almost 20 percent of the GHG reduction target the state has set: returning to 1990 levels by the year 2020. At CalCAN, we will continue our efforts to assure that sustainable agriculture is part of the solution, advocating for resources for sustainable farming practices that help lower agriculture’s GHG emissions, help growers adapt to the coming changes, and protect farmland that can help buffer against flood risk.

Filed Under: California Policy, Climate & Ag Research, Impacts of Climate Change Tagged With: CalCAN's work, California agriculture, cap-and-trade, carbon sequestration, climate change, climate legislation, effects of climate change, greenhouse gas, sustainable agriculture, technical assistance

A Wake Up Call From “The Dust Bowl”

December 13, 2012 by Hui Qian Leave a Comment

Filmmaker Ken Burns’ latest documentary “The Dust Bowl” aired on PBS in November, serves as a reminder and wake-up call about the threats posed by climate change to agriculture.

The documentary, consisting of two 2-hour films “The Great Plow-Up” and “Reaping the Whirlwind”, brings to the audience a vivid picture of one of the darkest times of the 20th century through a combination of survivor’s accounts, historian’s input, and dramatic movie footage. According to PBS, “The Dust Bowl chronicles the worst man-made ecological disaster in American history, in which the frenzied wheat boom of the ‘Great Plow-Up,’ followed by a decade-long drought during the 1930s nearly swept away the breadbasket of the nation… It is also a morality tale about our relationship to the land that sustains us—a lesson we ignore at our peril.”

“We were just too selfish and were trying to make more money off of the wheat, and it didn’t work out,” says one survivor. Resulted from both severe drought and unsustainable farming practices, the 1930s Dust Bowl left millions of acres of farmland ruined and hundreds of thousands of people dislocated, causing incalculable damage to the environment and economy.

“The next dust bowl” published in Nature, Joe Romm wrote, “Warming causes greater evaporation and, once the ground is dry, the Sun’s energy goes into baking the soil, leading to a further increase in air temperature. That is why, for instance, so many temperature records were set for the United States in the 1930s Dust Bowl; and why, in 2011, drought-stricken Texas saw the hottest summer ever recorded for a US state.”

So, are there any lessons from the 1930s Dust Bowl applicable to California agriculture? Certainly water issues top the list of concerns — at times flooding from early and rapid spring melting of the Sierra snow pack will challenge growers, and later in the dry season water scarcity will be the problem. With some notable exceptions in parts of the Central Valley, severe dust issues are not likely (though Romm argues that the risks have been underestimated).

Nonetheless, there are practices that California growers can adopt to buffer against the myriad of potential climate challenges. Investing in soil building tops the list. Practices such as cover cropping, applying compost and manure and conservation tillage increase the soil organic matter and provide many benefits — for example, increased water penetration and retention, reduced runoff and erosion, elevated carbon sequestration, enhanced fertility and productivity and economic gain. Investing in soil organic matter may be the best insurance policy a farmer can get to buffer against climate change and whatever version of a dust bowl disaster may California face.

Filed Under: California Policy, Climate & Ag Research, General Information, Impacts of Climate Change Tagged With: agricultural economy, California agriculture, climate change, drought, economic impacts, effects of climate change, farmer, farmland preservation, sustainable agriculture, water shortages

Honey Carbon Calculator Tracks Honey’s Greenhouse Gas Emissions

November 20, 2012 by Hui Qian Leave a Comment

Many California crops rely on bees. As the second largest producer of honey in the United States, every year California takes about 1.5 million bee colonies to pollinate 760,000 acres of almonds trees, producing nearly 2 billion pounds of nut products.

A recent article titled “California’s Honeypot, From Cradle to Grave” from UC Agriculture and Natural Resources calls attention to the carbon footprints of honey products. From nectar and pollination to the sweet tingles on your tongue, honey travels a long distance and requires a lot of energy to produce. For example, both hive construction and honey packaging consume energy in the form of fuel and electricity, and the transportation of hives around the country contributes significantly to GHG emissions.

Based on a life cycle assessment (LCA) of beekeeping activities and honey packing, researchers at UC Davis and the UC Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education Program (SAREP) recently created a honey carbon calculator to track the amount of GHG emissions that a honey product creates throughout the process.

“Transportation proved to be an important source of GHG emissions for the honey life cycle, both for nectar harvesting and transport to processors,” a UC Davis project titled “Carbon Footprint of U.S. Honey Production and Packing” concluded. The study suggested that honey producers could reduce energy consumption and GHG emissions by minimizing transport distances and improving transportation efficiency.

Emission tracking could lead to financial benefits for environmentally-conscious honey consumers. “If you can put a carbon negative sticker on your product, then you just expanded your market,” said Elias Marvinney, a UC Davis graduate student involved in the research.

Shrinking the climate footprint of beekeeping operations is “ultimately a benefit to a farmer’s bottom line,” said Alissa Kendall, an assistant professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering. “Efficiency in operations is often well aligned with reducing greenhouse gases and climate footprint…and often goes hand in hand with reducing energy use and dependence on fossil fuels and oil.”

Filed Under: California Policy, Climate & Ag Research, Farmer Resources Tagged With: agricultural economy, California agriculture, cap-and-trade, CARB, emission, emission-tracking, energy efficiency, greenhouse gas, honey, policy

CalCAN Field Day at Paicines Ranch

November 6, 2012 by Hui Qian Leave a Comment

The dependence of ranching on water makes drought a severe hardship for livestock operations and ranchers in California. Climate change models predict greater variability in temperature and precipitation, and therefore forage and water availability. Managing rangelands for water scarcity and greater resilience becomes essential to ensure the viability of California’s ranching sector.

In view of this, on Oct.30th CalCAN organized a field day at Paicines Ranch, south of Hollister, that was attended by 60 ranchers, farm advisors, land trust and open space organizations, and researchers.

The field day started with presentations by Dr. Ken Tate and Dr. Valerie Eviner from the Department of Plant Sciences at UC Davis. Considering that changes in annual precipitation and forage production in recent years have brought uncertainties to farm and ranch business, they discussed possible short- and long-term drought recovery strategies, considerations involved in fall versus spring calving and the use of carefully managed high production fields to buffer against lean years. Valerie also described a new project to develop a site-specific decision-making tool that will be developed with input from ranchers as well as scientific data.

Sheila Berry from the UC Cooperative Extension Alameda County talked about the need for good water quality to ensure adequate grazing time and livestock weight gain, as well as feed supplementation. Athena Pratt from Hollister’s NRDC office summarized the rangeland management practices that NRCS supports with its cost-share and grant programs such as fencing, water supplies and monitoring animal nutrition.

An afternoon tour of the 7,000 acre ranch was led by ranch manager Chris Ketcham and owner Sallie Calhoun. Using the tools of holistic management and rotational grazing, Paicines Ranch monitors its water resources strategically and strives to create as much healthy, diverse wetland habitats as possible, thus building an ecologically sustainable landscape where cattle and wildlife co-exist. Peter Donovan from the Soil Carbon Challenge described his efforts to measure soil carbon content on ranches across the country, including at Paicines Ranch, and encourage efforts to increase soil carbon sequestration.

“If you get up and tell your wife I’m going to look at the cattle, you are wrong. Grass is the priority. The grass is more important than the cattle,” one of the participants commented during the tour. “Soil micronutrients is the mother of all,” another responded.

The CalCAN Ranch Field Day was co-sponsored by San Benito Resource Conservation District, Community Foundation for San Benito County, California Rangeland Conservation Coalition, and Central Coast Rangeland Coalition.

“I liked the mix of research information and upcoming resource tools, along with practical range management practices, and hands-on look at what Paicines Ranch is doing on the land.”— Field day participant Sally Negroni, NRCS  Soil Conservationist

Filed Under: Climate & Ag Research, Farmer Resources, Featured - Sidebar Tagged With: California agriculture, carbon sequestration, climate change, climate models, drought, effects of climate change, field day, livestock agriculture, on-farm renewable energy, organic agriculture, rangeland, sustainable agriculture, water shortages

Joe Morris Wins Rangeland Stewardship Award

November 6, 2012 by Hui Qian Leave a Comment

We are pleased to announce that San Benito rancher Joe Morris of Morris Grassfed Beef has won the 2012 Clarence Burch Award presented by the Quivira Coalition in New Mexico. The award recognizes individuals, organizations and others who have led by example in promoting and accomplishing outstanding stewardship of private and/or public lands. Joe is a CalCAN farmer advisor and was nominated by CalCAN for this prestigious award. We are thrilled that his innovation and leadership has been recognized.

By effectively using his cattle to manage the land for carbon sequestration, water infiltration, and wildlife diversity, Joe proves that agriculture—if properly managed—can provide solutions to some of our most pressing climate change challenges, enhance ranch resilience in the face of a changing climate, and provide multiple environmental benefits.

Joe comes from a lineage of ranchers stretching back five generations, the most recent of which was his grandfather who ranched into the 1980s. In 1991, Joe and his wife Julie moved to San Juan Bautista and have been managing the 200-acre family ranch ever since. Today, they lease an additional 7,000 acres and run 250 cows to serve their grassfed beef direct marketing business, as well as approximately 1,800 stockers.

Joe uses holistic management—a decision-making process that uses grazing and animal impact to manage watersheds— as an organizing principle in his ranching business. For example, he manages large and dense herds of cattle with fencing and water supply to mimic the grazing patterns that herds of herbivores used as they co-evolved with California’s native grassland ecosystems over millennia. By intensively and adaptively managing water and grazing patterns, he gets higher rangeland utilization, maximal forage productivity, and increased local food production.

Properly managed cattle grazing can increase grassland species diversity and productivity. It can also increase the soil organic content which sequesters carbon and also improves water penetration and retention, thereby reducing erosion and making more water available for plants which is especially important in arid regions like San Benito. In addition, there is evidence that livestock fed on high-quality forage instead of grain may emit less methane (a potent GHG) during their digestive processes.

As land conservationists, Joe and Julie both serve on the Farmer Advisory Committee of CalCAN. Joe is a co-founder and remains active in the Central Coast Rangeland Coalition. Julie is a fellow of the California Agricultural Leadership Program and works part-time as the Executive Director of Community Vision San Benito County.

Joe shares the award with Pati Martinson and Terrie Bad Hand, co-directors of the Taos County Economic Development Corporation in New Mexico. The 11th Annual Burch Award will be presented at a dinner ceremony on November 16, 2012, at the conclusion of the Quivira Coalition’s 11th annual conference in Albuquerque, New Mexico. More information about the conference and the award is available at http://quiviracoalition.org.

Filed Under: Climate & Ag Research, Farmer Resources Tagged With: California agriculture, carbon sequestration, climate change, greenhouse gas, holistic management, livestock agriculture, on-farm energy, organic agriculture, Quivira Coalition, rangeland, sustainable agriculture
« Older Posts

Budget Surplus,Climate Action Deficit

On May 14th, Governor Jerry Brown released the latest version of his 2013/14 budget, which will now be debated and revised by the legislature in anticipation of their …
Learn More...

What’s New

  • New fact sheets on climate adaptation: Farming for Success in the 21st Century
  • Triple Harvest: Farmland conservation for climate protection, smart growth & food security
  • CalCAN Summit 2013 Presentations Available
  • Media Coverage

“Climate change raises the bar significantly – a major transformation of agriculture is needed.”

— Alexander Mueller.  FAO Assistant Director-General for Agriculture

Copyright © 2010 California Climate and Agriculture Network. All rights reserved. | Contact Us

Site Hosted by Gaiahost | Site by Deeper Shades Design

Return to top of page

Copyright © 2013 · Delicious Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in