California Climate & Agriculture Network

Advancing policy solutions at the nexus of climate change and sustainable agriculture

  • Home
  • About CalCAN
    • Guiding Principles
    • Opportunities & Challenges
    • Contact
    • Our Team
  • Our Work
    • CalCAN Fact Sheets
    • Climate-Friendly Farmer Stories
    • Ready…Or Not?
    • Videos
      • Workshop Video Presentations
      • CalCAN Summit 2011
      • CalCAN Summit 2009
    • Policy
      • Cap-and-Trade Revenue for Ag
      • California Air Resources Board
      • Carbon Market
      • Recommendations to Governor
      • Federal Climate Policy
      • SB 489: RE Equity Act
  • CalCAN in the News
  • Resources
    • Links
    • CalCAN Newsletter Archive
  • Blog
  • Donate

Wise land use decisions needed

September 13, 2011 by Renata Brillinger Leave a Comment

A false choice between food and renewable energy is playing out in our Central Valley. Fresno County Supervisors made a significant decision last week in approving a large solar project sited on prime farmland near Interstate 5. The project will generate 18 megawatts of solar power and cover 90 acres of high-value agricultural land – ending its use for food production.

The Fresno county’s planners and agriculture advisory committee argued that such large projects should be placed on less arable land. The Fresno County Farm Bureau also opposed the plan. But after considerable industry pressure, the Board disagreed and the project was approved.

California should aggressively move ahead with reaching its renewable energy targets. After all, California agriculture has a lot to lose if the worst impacts of climate change are not averted. But it shouldn’t come at the cost of sacrificing land that is needed for food production for generations to come.

There is no question that there is a role for farmlands in producing clean energy, and California farmers lead the way among their peers nationwide.

The USDA’s On-Farm Renewable Energy Production Survey reported that California farms produce 25 percent of the country’s on-farm renewable power generation, with almost 2,000 farm-based generators using mainly solar photovoltaics, thermal solar and wind. A CalCAN-sponsored bill (SB 489), which is now before the Governor for his signature, will remove some barriers to using agricultural by-products, like nut shells and orchard and vineyard prunings, to generate renewable energy. On-farm renewable energy projects integrated into farming operations — such as rooftop solar mounted on farm buildings and wind turbines combined with cattle ranching — augment farming operations and help farmers cut costs so they can stay in business. This is in sharp contrast to mega-projects like the one approved in Fresno that displace farmland and farmers.

There is no shortage of urban and rural rooftop space that can be deployed for solar power generation in a decentralized but coordinated fashion, a much preferable alternative to land grabs by solar power companies and utilities that disregard the impacts on agriculture and what that means for all of us as food consumers.

Filed Under: California Policy, Renewable Energy Tagged With: land use, renewable energy, solar

Urge Governor Brown to Support On-Farm Renewable Energy!

August 31, 2011 by Renata Brillinger Leave a Comment

Walnut shells to be turned into clean energy

Please call Governor Brown before Oct 9, 2011 to ask him to sign the Renewable Energy Equity Act, SB 489.

SB 489 passed out of the California Senate and Assembly with bipartisan support. Now it’s up to Governor Brown to make it law. This is a critical moment to keep this important bill moving towards passage and help farmers be part of California’s clean energy future.

SB 489 would make it easier for farmers and ranchers to develop innovation renewable energy projects by allowing them to easily and effectively get those projects connect to the grid. The Renewable Energy Equity Act will help California produce homegrown clean, renewable energy and reduce our state’s greenhouse gas emissions.

Make your voice heard and support sustainable agricultural solutions to climate change. Please call Governor Brown today. He could make his decision at any time.

Here are two ways to take action:

1.   The most effective thing you can do is fax or mail a letter. If you can represent an organization or business, here is a sample letter. If you are an individual, please use this version. Please personalize them if possible.

Fax: (916) 558-3177
Address: Governor Jerry Brown
c/o State Capitol, Suite 1173
Sacramento, CA 95814

2.   You can also call Governor Brown’s office at (916) 445-2841. Ask to speak to the staff person who handles agriculture issues. The message is simple:

“I am calling to ask Governor Brown to sign SB 489, the Renewable Energy Equity Act. SB 489 will help California reach its renewable energy goals, help the state’s agricultural producers develop renewable energy, and be a driver in the clean energy economy.”

Please let us know you took action. Drop us an email at info@calclimateag.org.

Filed Under: California Policy Tagged With: biomass, Governor Brown, net metering, on-farm renewable energy, Renewable Energy Equity Act, SB 489, waste into energy

Down on the Farm: Nuts to Renewable Energy

August 25, 2011 by Renata Brillinger Leave a Comment

Reposted from KQED Climate Watch

http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2011/08/24/another-renewable-energy-frontier-farm-biomass/

By Katrina Schwartz

California is just a few votes away from changing the rules to allow farmers to connect machines that create bioenergy to the electrical grid, a privilege that has thus far been reserved for farm-generated wind and solar energy.

Passage of the bill — SB 489 — would mean they could use the byproduct of their crops as fuel to create electricity.

Russ Lester, the owner of Dixon Ridge Farms, has been leading the charge to get the rules changed. He has gone to extraordinary lengths to shrink the carbon footprint of his organic walnut farm and processing plant in Yolo County. Brian Jenkins of the California Biomass Collaborative at UC Davis calls Lester the “guinea pig” of bioenergy.

Lester has installed a 50-kilowatt biogasifier that burns walnut shells at high temperatures to create fuel to run his generator, and heat to dry his walnuts. Lester has demonstrated his contraption to many people, including legislators, members of the California Air Resources Board and countless interested farmers. He’s been making the case for SB 489 as the only way to make this type of environmental commitment pay off for farmers. He predicts that many farmers will follow suit if state policy and regulations support farmers to use alternative energy in their businesses.

Beyond creating heat and power to become sustainable, Lester also mixes the char ash leftover from burning walnut shells into the soil where it sequesters stable forms of carbon for hundreds of years and fertilizes his walnut trees. He’s even looking into using walnut oil—another byproduct of processing—as a fuel to replace diesel to run his machinery. Lester says he’s on pace to meet his goal of being energy-neutral by 2012.

“We’re still not 100 percent,” he told me on a recent visit to the farm. “We’re probably at about 45% reduction in our energy usage, but it’s a substantial improvement. So the naysayers who say you can’t do that are really not correct.”

One of the biggest challenges Lester has faced is air quality regulation. It seems that every air quality district in California has different restrictions based on the particular challenges in that neck of the woods. So, the regulations that Lester must meet in the Yolo-Solano Air Quality District are quite different from those a farmer would face in the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District. That can pose a problem for farmers operating in districts with chronically bad air quality as any emissions they create will be closely watched.

Kevin Hall, a co-founder of the Central Valley Air Quality Coalition, says he supports efforts by farmers to produce renewable energy, but he’s wary of the potential effect on air quality. As long as producers like Lester keep their systems under the one-megawatt limit set out in SB 489, says Hall, it shouldn’t be a problem. It’s conceivable that many small growers could produce the same amount of pollution as a large power plant if they aren’t regulated. Very few California farmers have a biogasifier like Lester’s, so Hall isn’t too concerned just yet.

The biggest opposition to SB 489 comes from utilities. In its opposition letter, PG&E claimed that net-metering (allowing sale-back to the grid) of all renewables would cost the average ratepayer more. The California Public Utilities Commission found the opposite in its analysis [PDF]; that SB 489 would likely reduce the cost to the average consumer. That’s because farmers and commercial consumers of electricity already pay some costs that residential consumers don’t, like the cost to distribute and transmit the power. Those embedded fees make net metering for bioenergy less expensive than net metering for residential solar. PG&E’s numbers are based on the performance of solar net metering.

The other problem utilities point to is the net-metering cap. Right now, utilities buy no more than five percent of their peak energy load through the net-metering program. If more types of technology are eligible for the program, that could mean reaching the cap more quickly. If that happens, legislators might be tempted to raise the cap. For utilities, that would mean managing lots of small producers instead of a few big ones.  Nor does the energy produced through net metering count towards the utilities’ state-mandated renewable energy targets. Right now, no utility is close to reaching the cap. Most are still buying less than two percent of their power from net metering.

Supporters of SB 489 are close to reaching their goal. The bill has a broad range of environmental and agricultural supporters, including the California Climate and Agriculture Network (CalCAN) and the California Farm Bureau Federation. It won significant bipartisan support as it moved through various committees in both the Senate and the Assembly. The next hurdle will be a full Assembly vote and another full Senate vote to reconcile some small changes. Senate sponsor Lois Wolk (D-Stockton) says Governor Jerry Brown has been supportive of the bill and that if it gets to his desk before the end of the legislative year on September 9th, he’s likely to sign it.

The Biomax 50 produces heat and power for Russ Lester’s organic walnut farm. Lester hopes that SB 489 will allow him to hook the biogasifier to the electrical grid soon.

Filed Under: California Policy

New CDFA Environmental Panel

August 19, 2011 by Renata Brillinger Leave a Comment

CDFA Secretary Karen Ross recently announced new appointments to a CDFA advisory group, the Cannella Environmental Farming Act Science Panel. The panel is charged with reviewing agriculture’s impacts on the environment and creating a voluntary environmental farming program to provide incentives to farmers and ranchers whose conservation practices provide environmental benefits, including improved air and water quality and enhanced wildlife habitat.

At CalCAN, we are pleased not only that Secretary Ross has made it a priority to breathe life into the panel, which was established in law in the mid-1990s, but that she populated it with several knowledgeable and experienced members.

Three of the panel members have served in various advisory capacities with CalCAN: Ann Thrupp, PhD, is the Manager of Sustainability and Organic Development at Fetzer & Bonterra Vineyards; Brian Leahy from the Resources Agency, Department of Conservation; Louise Jackson, PhD, University of California Cooperative Extension (ex officio member). We look forward to supporting these and the other committee members in their efforts, and we commend Secretary Ross for devoting resources to the panel and its important work.

Filed Under: California Policy

More Conservation Funds Available to California Farmers

August 4, 2011 by Renata Brillinger Leave a Comment

Rep. Dennis Cardoza (CA-18) and Rep. Jim Costa (CA-20) recently announced the availability of an additional $9.5 million in funding through the 2008 Farm Bill’s Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP). The funds go to California farmers seeking to make on farm improvements that will help air quality, water quality or conserve water.

The recent federal arguments over the debt ceiling and budget cuts have failed to distinguish between good spending and bad spending. At CalCAN, we are pleased to see these funds released in part because they are examples of wise public investments. Dollars spent on farm conservation programs have multiple benefits-protecting ecosystems services, increasing on-farm biodiversity and resilience to climate change, in some cases enhancing carbon sequestration, supporting innovative farmers doing environmental stewardship, and supporting rural economies.

Filed Under: Farmer Resources Tagged With: Cardoza, conservation funds, Costa, farm bill

On-farm renewable energy bill ready for Senate vote

April 28, 2011 by Renata Brillinger 2 Comments

The Renewable Energy Equity Act (SB 489) has cleared both of its Senate Committees with resounding support. The Energy, Utilities and Communications Committee passed it on a 9 to 2 bipartisan vote, and on May 26th the Appropriations Committee voted 8 to 0 in favor.

The bill, authored by Senator Wolk (D-Davis), would include all eligible forms of renewable energy in the state’s net energy metering program. For farmers and food processors who have agricultural waste they want to turn into energy, it removes technical and financial barriers that have been prohibitive to on-farm energy generation.

SB 489, sponsored by CalCAN, has much support from agriculture including the California Farm Bureau, the California Rice Commission, the Almond Hullers & Processors Association, CAFF, CCOF, Ecological Farming Association, and numerous environmental groups and individual farmers.

SB 489 now to the full floor of the Senate on May 31st. Please call your Senator to voice your support!

Filed Under: California Policy, Featured - Sidebar Tagged With: on-farm energy, on-farm renewable energy, policy

Water outlook bleak for California agriculture

April 28, 2011 by Renata Brillinger 1 Comment

Earlier this week, the Department of Interior released a report describing the projected shifts in temperature, precipitation and runoff caused by climate change in eight Western river basins.

Three of the eight river basins are of importance for California agriculture, most notably the Sacramento and San Joaquin basins that provide water for six of the state’s top 10 agricultural counties. The report also looked at the Klamath basin (in northern California) and the Colorado basin (supplying the agriculturally important Imperial Valley).

Fact sheets and the full report provide detail, but generally the report validates what other analyses have found—that California’s water supplies will be greatly stressed by reduced snowpack and changed patterns of runoff, and existing tensions between agricultural, urban and environmental uses of the water will exacerbate.

In a nutshell, this is how it will happen. In this century, temperatures will increase by roughly 5-6 °F in each of the river systems. The warmer conditions will cause earlier snowmelt and more moisture falling as rain instead of snow at lower elevations, thereby increasing the risk of flooding. Because late spring and summer runoff will decrease, there will be greater surface water shortages through the summer dry season, significantly increasing future demands on groundwater. Particularly in the Colorado system, warming will also cause significant reservoir evaporation and losses during water conveyance and irrigation. The warmer temperatures will cause increased water demands by agriculture at times when less water will be available.

Warmer conditions might result in increased fishery stress, reduced salmon habitat, increased water demands for instream ecosystems, shifts in species geographic ranges, and increased invasive species infestations. Endangered species issues might be exacerbated.

Warmer temperatures will increase the demand for electricity—especially during hot summer months—while at the same time the reduced water supply will hamper hydropower generation. This will put pressure on both the demand and cost of electricity.

This report paints an obviously bleak picture for agriculture. Combined with other expected impacts—new pest, invasive species and disease pressures, decreased chill hours essential for fruit and nut production, livestock stress, and erratic and extreme weather events—the notorious adaptability of farmers and ranchers will be put to the test and the principles and practices of sustainable agriculture will no longer be a philosophical or market-based choice but rather an imperative for survival.

Filed Under: Climate & Ag Research Tagged With: California agriculture, climate models, effects of climate change, water shortages

Researchers and farmers discuss climate change impacts on agriculture

April 10, 2011 by Renata Brillinger 1 Comment

Original post by Jane Sooby, April 8, 2011
Organic Farming Research Foundation

To mark the release of a new report on agriculture and climate change, an overflow crowd gathered in Davis for the California Climate and Agriculture Summit on March 31.

The report, Ready … Or Not? An Assessment of California Agriculture’s Readiness for Climate Change, was prepared by the California Climate and Agriculture Network (CalCAN) who also organized the summit.

Main findings from the report are that, while California has progressed in understanding the impacts of climate change on agriculture, little work has been done to show how agriculture can reduce emissions or sequester carbon.

In addition, because of historic and ongoing cuts in Cooperative Extension and conservation programs, the state lacks capacity to provide farmers and ranchers with the technical assistance they need to manage anticipated changes.

Changes in agricultural conditions due to climate change that were reported at the summit include considerable reduction in chilling hours—an important factor for many fruit and nut crops—earlier peak stream flows, less snow and more rain, resulting in increased winter flooding and decreased reservoir levels in summer.

The authors of Ready or Not? set out to quantify the number of studies on climate change impacts on agriculture in California. They found only 39 research projects addressing the issue. Only four of these studies focused on organic agriculture.

At the same time, research indicates that organic farming and dairy production can play important roles in mitigating climate change. Chuck Benbrook, chief scientist at the Organic Center, presented data showing that, per unit of production, organic pasture-based dairy emits 77-80% of the methane emitted by conventional dairies.

Soil scientist Michel Cavigelli with USDA’s Agricultural Research Service reported on results of a long-term systems comparison trial at Beltsville, Maryland. Data from that study show that the global warming potential of organic systems in carbon dioxide equivalents is negative, meaning that organic farming is sequestering more carbon than the greenhouse gases it emits. No-till systems showed moderate global warming potential while conventional tillage showed about twice as much as no-till. The amount of soil carbon sequestered was the biggest source of difference between systems.

Karen Ross, the new Secretary of the California Dept. of Food and Agriculture, opened the summit by saying, “Research is key to everything we’re doing on climate change.”

Ross recounted that the agricultural and environmental communities in California were successful in working together to gain conservation programs in the last Farm Bill. She challenged both groups to cooperate again in making plans to address the impacts of climate change on agriculture.

Filed Under: Climate & Ag Research

Agriculture Climate Benefits Act Clears First Hurdle

April 5, 2011 by Renata Brillinger 2 Comments

The Senate Environmental Quality Committee voted 5-2 yesterday (April 4th) to approve the Agriculture Climate Benefits Act (SB 237), legislation authored by Senator Lois Wolk (D-Davis) to help the state’s farmers and ranchers cope with the state’s changing climate and recognize the critical role agriculture can play in reducing greenhouse emissions.

SB 237 will assure that future revenue generated by the state’s climate change law designated to agriculture will be spent on climate-friendly sustainable agriculture practices.

“California agriculture contributes $35 billion annually to California’s economy, and supplies more than half of the country’s fruit and vegetables. Senate Bill 237 helps the state’s farmers and ranchers, the people who fuel this fast-growing sector of our economy, cope with a changing climate,” said Senator Lois Wolk (D-Davis). “The bill also recognizes that agriculture can play an important role in reducing greenhouse gas emissions.”

In a state where water is already scarce, climate change scenarios predict that water supplies will become increasingly constrained—conditions that, in addition to warming temperatures, threaten to shift the kinds of crops that can be grown in California.

“California agriculture is uniquely vulnerable to climate change,” said Jeanne Merrill, Policy Director with the California Climate and Agriculture Network.  “SB 237 recognizes that agriculture can both reduce greenhouse gas emissions and adapt to a changing climate, and that the state must make these issues a priority.” 

In fact, research funded by the California Energy Commission suggests that some agricultural practices not only reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, but may also sequester atmospheric carbon in the soil.

As California implements AB 32, the California Global Warming Solutions Act, new funds will become available to support GHG emissions reductions and help the state adapt to climate change.

SB 237 defines the eligible uses of funds designated to the agriculture sector from implementation of the state’s climate change law, including:

1.     Research and demonstration projects to examine the farming practices and systems that reduce GHG emissions, sequester atmospheric carbon and help farmers adapt to climate change.

2.     Technical assistance for producers that translates research findings into real opportunities for California agriculture to provide climate benefits.

3.     Incentives for farmers and ranchers to overcome barriers to climate-friendly agricultural practices.

Filed Under: AB 32 Implementation, California Policy

Farms and Fuel

March 29, 2011 by Renata Brillinger 1 Comment

The USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service recently released the results of its first nationwide survey on renewable energy practices on America’s farms and ranches. The On-Farm Renewable Energy Production Survey reported that California leads the country with almost 25% of the total farms producing renewable power (1,956 of 8,569 total operations). The most predominant technology (92%) was solar photovoltaics and thermal solar, followed by wind, with a small number of methane digesters. Unsurprisingly, farmers in nearly every state reported savings on their utility bills.

California has already established itself as a leader in green technology, and just today the state legislature  approved a Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) being that raises the bar on the amount of renewable energy required in our electricity mix to 33% by 2020. The USDA survey demonstrates that farms and ranches can help achieve this goal.

Senator Lois Wolk (D-Solano) has introduced legislation that will help us get there by removing barriers to on-farm renewable power production. The Renewable Energy Equity Act (SB 489) opens California’s Net Energy Metering Program to all eligible forms of renewable energy. It will make it easier and more economically feasible for some agriculture businesses to convert waste products such as orchard prunings and shells from nut trees into biogas that generates electricity.

Russ Lester, owner of Dixon Ridge Farms, is an organic walnut grower and processor of most of California’s organic walnuts. A few years ago, he installed a biogasifier that burns walnut hulls and produces electricity to run the walnut dyers. Russ installed this system without the benefit of net metering which, if SB 489 passes, would remove some of the bureaucratic barriers to hooking up systems like his to the grid and maximizing the production of renewable energy, as well as earning money if these operations produce more than they can use.

Dixon Ridge Farms biogasifier

CalCAN is a sponsor of SB 489, so please contact us if you’d like to know how to support the bill. And stay tuned for more information.

Filed Under: California Policy
« Older Posts
Newer Posts »

Investing in Sustainable Agricultural Solutions to Climate Change

This year, California’s long-anticipated cap-and-trade program goes into effect. The ground was laid for the program in 2006 when Governor Schwarzenegger signed into …
Learn More...

What’s New

  • Cap-and-Trade Revenue for Ag
  • Climate-Friendly Farmer Stories
  • Organic Fact Sheet
  • CalCAN in the News

“Human well-being is wrapped up with how food is produced. Ingenious systems were developed over the past century to supply food, with remarkable reliability, to a good portion of the world\'s 6.7 billion people. But these systems need a fundamental restructuring over the next few decades to establish sustainable food systems that both slow and are resilient to climate change.”

— Worldwatch Institute.  State of the World: Into a Warming World. Chapter 3. 2009

Copyright © 2010 California Climate and Agriculture Network. All rights reserved. | Contact Us

Site Hosted by Gaiahost | Site by Deeper Shades Design